Why are field welds slower than shop welds?
Position, access, weather, fit-up and inspection. The same joint that runs flat on a shop table may be overhead on a lift behind a wind screen.
Construction estimating tool
Welding hours per linear foot by weld type, separated into shop and field — because the same weld costs considerably more out of position and off the ground.
Curated reference table · 8 weld types, not an observed aggregate
Estimated hours
28
| Scope | p10 | Median | p90 | Obs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hr / ft | — | 0.28 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.7 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.086 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.22 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.055 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.14 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.16 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.4 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.12 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.3 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.42 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 1.05 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.18 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.45 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.28 | — | — |
| hr / ft | — | 0.7 | — | — |
Computed over 8 observed records. These are observed rates from real priced estimates — not an industry average and not a benchmark. They are a starting point for your own estimate, never a substitute for one, and they carry no money: labour rates, markup and margin are yours.
Position, access, weather, fit-up and inspection. The same joint that runs flat on a shop table may be overhead on a lift behind a wind screen.
No. Edge prep, fit-up, tacking, NDT and rework are separate, and on CJP work they can exceed the welding itself.
Less solid than the other rate tools here, and it says so. This is a curated reference table of eight weld types rather than an aggregate computed over thousands of observed lines, so treat it as a planning starting point and calibrate against your own welders before you lean on it.
Anvil connects your rates, your shop history and your estimates.